OKIN COLLECTIVE

옥인콜렉티브
Okin Collective(Hwayong Kim, Joungmin Yi and Shiu Jin/formed in 2009) is an artists’ collective that was initiated to address the eviction of the residents of the Okin Apartment complex in Jongno District due to the tearing-down of the apartment complex. It has been interacting with audiences inside and outside of the community through its videos, performances, and radio broadcastings while delving into the social issues arising in the cities under redevelopment with its focus on the relationship between communities and individuals. It has intervened in the social challenges through unconventional approaches: the Collective’s members and the residents had a party on the rooftop of the particular apartment building while organizing screening, exhibition, and concert; the artists asked the workers who were wrongfully laid off from Cort Guitars, a guitar manufactuerer perform Shakespeare’s Hamlet; the Collective also designed a stretching exercise to satire the risk society exposed to the disaster such as the Fukushima radiation leak. Its projects have laid bare the ambivalent and multilayered emotions, attitudes, and situations of people implicitly embedded in the simplified representations of relations and circumstances in the media so as to deal with the meanings and/or limits of the conflicts, reconciliations, and solidarities between community and individual, between communities, and between individuals in the modern urban environment. The devoted artistic efforts of Okin Collective are revealed here through the video that documents its revisitation to the site of the Okin Apartments at which a park is constructed, and Random Archive, which shows its activities since 2009.

Interview

CV

OKIN COLLECTIVE (2009 – / Yi Joungmin, Kim Hwayong, Jin Shiu)
http://okin.cc

<Selected Exhibitions/Projects>
2018
Toward Mysterious Realities, Total Museum, Seoul
2017
Reenacting History, National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, Korea(Gwacheon)
2017
Urban Ritornello, Ilmin Museum of Art, Seoul
2017
Dancers, Art Space Pool, Seoul & Gyeongnam Art Museum, Changwon, Korea
2017
do it 2017, Seoul, Ilmin Museum of Art, Seoul
2017
Video Portrait, Total Museum of Art, Seoul, Korea
2017
In the Presence of Others, Korean Culture Center India, New Delhi, India
2016
The 3rd Nanjing International Art Festival-History Code: Scarcity, and Supply, Nanjing, China
2016
EAST ASIAN VIDEO FRAMES:SHADES OF URBANIZATION, Pori Art Museum, Finland
2016
Art in Society: Land of Happiness, Seoul Museum of Art, Buk Seoul Branch, Seoul
2016
Art Spectrum 2016, Leeum, Seoul
2016
Rien ne va plus? Faites vos jeux!, De Appel Arts Center, Amsterdam, NETHERLANDSs
2015
2015 Asian Art Biennale, National Taiwan Fine Art Museum, Taichung, Taiwan
2015
Survival K(n)it 7, Riga, Latvia
2015
Society of Choreography, Nam June Paik Art Center, Yongin, Korea
2015
EAST ASIAN VIDEO FRAMES, Pori Art Museum, Finland
2014
The 10th Gwangju Biennale-Burning Down the House, Gwangju, Korea
2014
Post-Movement: Night of Café Mueller, Kuandu Museum od Fine Art, Taipei, Taiwan
2014
Good Morning, Mr. Orwell, Nam June Paik Art Center, Yongin, Korea
2013
No Dance!: Between Body and Media, Zero One Design Center, Seoul
2013
No Mountain High Enough, Audio Visual Pavilion, Seoul
2013
Acts of Voicing, Total Museum of Art, Seoul
2012
Truth is Concrete, Steirischer Herbst 2012, Gratz, Austria
2012
The Forces Behind, Doosan Gallery, New York, USA
2012
Stop the City, Take the Street, Seoul Art Space Seogyo, Seoul
2011
Life, No Peace, Only Adventure, Busan Museum of Art, Busan, Korea
2010
Solo Exhibition, Concrete Island, Takeout Drawing, Seoul
2010
Solo Exhibition, Okin OPEN SITE, Okin Apartments Demolition Site, Seoul
2010-Present
Okin Internet Radio Station [STUDIO+82]
2009.7-2010.11
Okin Apartments Project, Okin Apartments, Seoul

<Selected Performances/Workshops>
2017
Instruction 2017-Like the duration of a rainbow, Ilmin Museum of Art, Seoul
2017
[Practice-03 Words and Location], National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, Korea, Gwacheon, Korea
2016
[Practice -02 Interlude], Youido Square/C-47 Airplane Exhibition Space, Seoul
2015
[Practice -01 Lung and Repetition], Nam June Paik Art Center, Yongin, Korea
2014
Operation-For the Beloved and Song, The 10th Gwangju Biennale, Gwangju, Korea
2014
Seoul Decadance-Live, Indie Art Hall GONG and rooftop, Seoul
2013
Mom-mal workshop, Art Space Pool, Seoul
2013
Playground in Island 2013, Workshop, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
2012
Don Quixote del Carre, Street Performance, Barcelona, Spain
2012
DJing-Korea Modern Superfine Affairs, Sound Performance, National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, Korea(Gwacheon)
2012
Operation-For Something Black and Hot, 19 Performance Relay, Seoul
2011
Operation-For Something White and Cold, Gallery Loop and Donggyo-dong area, Seoul
2010
5 Minute Revolution Manifesto, Nam June Paik Art Center, Yongin, Korea(Curated by Claudia Pestana)
2010
Jeju Human Rights Conference Workshop, Jeju/Seoul, Korea

<Selected Screenings>
2016
Exis-Experimental Film and Video Festival in Seoul, Korean Film Archive, Seoul, Korea
2015
ARTEFACT FESTIVAL 15, STUK, Ghent, Belgium
2015
The 15th Seoul International New Media Art Festival, Indie Space, Seoul
2014
Total Recall, Ilmin Museum of Art & Korean Film Archive/, Seoul, Korea
2013
The Spectacle and the detour of strategy, Guy Debord and Situationist International, media theater Igong, Seoul, Korea
2012
The 4thOffandFreeInternationalFilmFestival, Seoul, Korea

<Residencies>
2013
Incheon Art Platform, Incheon, Korea
2012
Hangar International Residency, Barcelona, Spain
2011-2012
Geumcheon Art Factory, Seoul, Korea

<Collections>
Seoul Museum of Art (SeMA)
National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, Korea (MMCA)
Museum of Contemporary Art Busan (MOCA Busan)

Critic 1

Okin Collective: New Urban Design, Deployment, and Proposition of Apparatuses for Kinship Communities

Cho Ju-hyun (Chief Curator of Ilmin Museum of Art )

 

 

“Consider, then, the text given us by the existence, in the hindgut of modern South Australian termites, of the creature named Mixotricha paradoxa, a mixed-up, paradoxical, microscopic bit of “hair.” This little filamentous creature makes a mockery of the notion of bounded, defended singular self out to protect its generic investments.”1

1. Friends or Relatives? : Intimacy As Strangers 

“What caused us to be excited in that moment? …… It was incited, associated with a more primitive death or disappearance. Perhaps it was solidarity among those who cannot be free from any humble birth or death, or the fear of death, and those who are not yet damaged, or indulgence in an enormous burial ground-playground that is not yet possessed by anyone.”2

The quotation above resembling a passage from a post-apocalyptic novel describing a world after the end of human civilization is from the monologue of artist Joungmin Yi who witnessed Okin-dong’s dreary, surreal scenes. Grayish cement debris of a building appallingly crumbling down as if being gutted by giant flames, ragged walls exposing a skinny steel framework, pieces of glass windows shattered and scattered on an earthen ground, and a futile, gloomy atmosphere hovering over this desolate, dreary site… The Okin Apartments Project (2009-2010) carried out by Okin Collective consisting of Joungmin Yi, Hwayong Kim, and Shiu Jin in July 2007 was a sort of happening executed by both artists and local residents who had unintentionally gathered together to cope with the unexpected situation of forced demolitions for a redevelopment project undertaken by the Seoul Metropolitan Government.

At this site with the invitation of Hwayong Kim who had resided there, Okin Collective’s member artists witnessed traces of life discarded by urban authorities who wielded tremendous power in a capital-centered modern society as they were ruthlessly being erased. The emotions they instinctually shared in such a disorganized, confused situation were a source of endless anxiety and an unknown sense of defeat which they felt while living in and enduring this era as “young” artists with “intimacy as strangers.” What is the meaning of solidarity among those who have voluntarily gathered together, run around the “enormous burial ground-playground,” and survived to form a heap of dead bodies? What can survivors do in a situation in which they have no future? What does these artists’ experience of a disaster scene predict?

The Okin Apartments Project, connotative of the narrative of a tremendous collapse or a devastating end in which people have no hope at all, save for the fact that they are alive, was in a context different from that of any common social or artistic practice or behaviorist artistic movement. The only action they could take in a world damaged by capitalism and with no more solutions was to “go together with strangers.” Internalizing despair and anxiety, they instinctually wrapped themselves up in their tentacles, infected others with their secretions, and formed an atypical group. Their solidarity was literally organic while using the title “collective” in some moments and not fixing its members or setting any specific target.

For over one year after they began to interfere in their neighbors’ affairs, the practices they executed with their colleague artists and the displaced residents were insubstantial party-like events such as playing a treasure-hunt game in waste materials around deserted apartments as if to sense the world through a children’s game; camping on the rooftop of an apartment building with invited residents; holding a sketch competition with colleague artists; and holding an impromptu performance at a demolition site. They occupied a place where every life form had been extinguished and provided neighbors whom they had never interacted with before with very unfamiliar experiences combined with something they had never imagined such as plays, travel, and exhibitions. By doing so, they came to develop an apparatus to unmask ideologies innate in the site and make residents aware of their own problems, after which they could assert and put their perceptions into action.

Okin Collective observes communities whose existence is not revealed or sensed as they are on the edge of our society. These communities’ “situation” instinctively causes individuals to form a group. Beneficial microorganisms are known to inhabit the bodies of many plants and animals. A recent study released by science journal Evolution Letters shows that intestinal microorganisms are parasitic on a host but have evolved into beneficial protectors when harmful bacteria attack the host. The host has also evolved to help more microorganisms inhabit its body. As advantages are maximized through the co-evolution of the host and the microorganism, they coexist in a symbiotic relationship, adapting themselves to each other.3

The fact that individuals who are strangers have evolved together in a situation in which they have to stand in solidarity against an external enemy leads us to reconsider the relations of communities that have been out of sight in our society. Around 2010 there was a noticeable increase in the number of small groups forged by artists of diverse fields such as visual artists, designers, and curators who have addressed art’s social practice in the Korean art scene. They commonly share “anxiety,” a legacy of our time undertaken by the younger generation.

Artists who had undergone Korea’s financial crisis in 2008 and young artists who had just entered the art scene at the time were consoled from their private solidarity with their “friends” with similar tastes and attitudes.4 As a result, they formed a bond of sympathy in a social situation damaged by capitalism and began their public discourse. All the same, solidarity with those who have “preferences and directions similar to my own” on which artist communities are based rests on the notion of a considerably solid boundary. In other words, they try to put emphasis on homogeneity in the name of “a friend,” but their communities are exclusive by nature and their solidarity is no more than an extension of biological classification after modern times. The fusion of the same kind suitable for crossbreeding brings about another type of alienation and has generic limitations. We cannot cope with any new diverse issues that arise in our society through solidarity with friends alone.5

On the contrary to this, those who have no power as subjects on the edge of society achieve evolution while “eating, infecting, being eaten, or being infected” by one another just as the seeds of plants germinate via infection under natural conditions.6 These are not based on exclusive relationships among friends, but on kinship relationships they have evolved through long-lasting intimacy primarily with strangers like new kinds of cells, organizations, and organs. Kindred things do not enter into relations with other things, but forge relationships that instinctively attach and tangle up with one another by spreading their tentacles.7 They form communities based on bonds that supersede preexisting ideologies while embracing true friendship and love across a register of bonds of intimacy.8 The ways in which Okin Collective has addressed communities over the last ten years vary. In the communities Okin Collective has observed, things occupy each other’s bodies and forge groups as “infective social relations” among very unfamiliar organizations and cells.

2. The City Trilogy : Being-Together 

At this exhibition Okin Collective presents The City Trilogy addressing a few invisible communities primarily in Seoul, Incheon, and Jeju. They demonstrate the kind of social meaning solidarity among artists and rough, open communities can have in From the Outside (2018) which fragmentally documents the process in which the artist collective came into being. Their latest work titled In Search of How to Revolve and Its Reverse (2018) is an observation of a community of local artists living and working in the old downtown of Incheon. This documentary video featuring a community of local artists who live on the edge of the central art scene lays out the stories of those who have overcome dead-end situations in which their life force was exhausted. What can artists do where there is no base for their activities? How can their art be sustainable? The member artists of the artist community “Hoijeon Art,” the object of this work’s observation, vary in their origin, background, and age. The community consists of artists who have settled in this city in “a stuffed state where time stands still”9 and is comprised of a group of colleagues who have no choice but to meet together in a place where the artistic population is so small. Compared to a group whose members are forced by some ideology or share some consciousness, this group of artists spontaneously and instinctively came into being.

Utterly exhausted by inconsistent, irresponsible cultural policies carried out in the specific situation of Incheon, its bland disorderly urban systems, and policy-makers’ despotism and absurdity, those artists give testimony of the despair and sense of defeat they felt living in this hopeless city served as an opportunity to shape a unique community. Their only goal is thus rather to seek pleasure in a hopeless state in a place approximating “an enormous graveyard.” According to Jean-Luc Nancy, the moment humans are in existence together with others, depending on them, is when they realize that their existence is finite. To Nancy, a community is not a collection of separate individuals with the same beliefs and ideology but there is only an existential community or “being-in-common.” Defined as “the inoperative community,” this communal character refers to a state in which “I exist with other together.” “Inoperative” here means “inaction” producing nothing or letting something arrive. Characterized by “singularity” as having no value, each individual in a community can be complete only in the boundary where the individual comes across another singular being, the other’s skin (or heart). This refers to a state in which I am entirely myself and simultaneously can be the other: divided and sharing with one another (partage).10

The artists of Hoijeon Art lends meaning to their announcement that they rotate together to explore their identity as artists while living their own life. Their revolution is either a meaningless idling rotation or rotation together with others. Gestures from martial arts as “vain, useless technique,” the main apparatus Okin Collective adopted in their series Operation also convey an important message in this work. As in demonstrations by a master of martial arts, “rotation” is a technique (apparatus) to sense the moment in the subconscious. The meaning of “rotating” together contains the potential for a new condition in which the artists of Hoijeon Art dominate others with ease using the center of gravity abruptly arising when they rotate together in one direction as well as the potential moment in which their rotation works as both action and reaction in a powerful whirlpool. Even though that is idling, this movement enables their bodies to be balanced and to prepare for the next revolution. While exploring other lives outside art, they become able to create a sustainable situation in which they keep rotating, touching others’ skin (or heart). This “community of finite beings” manifested only when its artists are together as shared beings has its own distinction, appearing as “something to come up” in an unstable state.

Casa d’Or (Golden House)(2017), one of the city trilogy, is a documentary video that is the result of observing the lives of old people conscious of “death” and a community of senior citizens. The coffee shop Casa d’Or located at the original center of Jeju is a community space that functions different from those of common coffee shops. This old café whose interior design appears archaic is a place where the elderly of this region spend their time listening to classical music. The decent elders sitting around a TV monitor have a friendly talk while watching an opera performance of The Tragedies of Sophocles in Japan. What do the elders enjoying the high-brow culture of classical music commonly feel? An old gentleman who worked as the director of a medical center in Jeju for 18 years mentions that both money and relationships with friends and family members are meaningless for one who is on the verge of death. An elder who worked as a pastor raises some significant issue pertaining to Casa d’Or. That is elders have something in common, moving beyond some secular conditions such as educational background, social status, gender, and power. This community is associated with the emotional solidarity available for a kinship community by embracing others as part of themselves with their instinctive sense before life and death instead of some social conditions used to distinguish themselves from others and create vertical boundaries.

The community of the elders the Casa d’Or Okin Collective observed seems to show evidence that humans cannot form a veritable community without the perception that they are finite beings. At the same time, it could be an example of a group inspired by a new sense of aesthetic community Nancy mentioned. Casa d’Or, a community formed by a common interest in art is a group shaped through a process of deconstructing human identity after mutual identification. A community stimulated by the senses is forged based on “sharing the sensuous,” breaking away from the preexisting social divisions. In the process of subjectifying its members, the community works on the premise that all humans are equal. In this sense, it makes the arts working as the medium of this community have a true political effect. In this video, Casa d’Or or Golden House, a dialogue of female senior citizens reminds one of a gender community placed on the polar opposite of public order in dichotomous logic. They worry about how to clean their space while appreciating an opera.

Okin Collective shaped through their concerns over urban issues when intervening in the process of demolishing the Okin apartments has banded together with diverse invisible subjects in society such as workers, sexual minorities, old men, and minor persons. Dedicated to recreating the relationships destructed by modernity in present time, they make forays into sharing difficulties to recover a destroyed haven. They are neither themselves nor others but either us all or countless beings in Okin.

3. Apparatus-Fiction, Apparatus-Community

Okin Collective forged communities over the last ten years by unmasking ideologies adopted by power in our society, regarding not only their own community but also other diverse communities as an apparatus. In general, an apparatus is a kind of equipment commonly used to achieve a particular objective, like mechanical equipment. Inevitably accompanying power (strength), those who possess an apparatus are able to control any national and social system. The apparatus concept referring to the system in which power relations strategically operate has been scrutinized from various angles by modern thinkers of the late 20th century such as Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and Giorgio Agamben. Foucault discusses the point in which the operation mechanism of the apparatus “has a strategic function as the nature of the connection point between plural elements” through the concept of “dispositif” clarifying that the apparatus ultimately “poses questions concerning a ‘fixed’ power or system and is able to work as fluid power to overturn this.”11

That is, one who decides where to arrange is a determinant of meaning. The apparatus mechanisms such as the arrangement or deployment of artworks by the museum or gallery curators or the manager’s control mechanism that has subordinated the general public to specific ideological effects were adopted for the disclosure of social and economic systems by artists of minimalism and were critical of institutions in the mid-20th century. This is because a place for art is more than just a space—it is where ideological effects are entailed and works as a systematic frame involved in a power game.

Okin Collective has paid heed to the possibility of working as an apparatus in the reality they face and in the situation in which art cannot function properly in society. At the same time, they have tried to turn their place of art, collective, and invisible organism into a relational network to disclose various issues and interests pertaining to society, culture, the economy, politics, and the institutions around them, forming solidarity with those who are on the edge of society and confronting a very solid apparatus like the social system. The apparatus mechanism conceived through Okin Collective’s diverse projects is intended to create “a stage dominated by reality.” It is in the form of the theater as a sort of post-drama, becoming both art and a political act.

Okin Collective’s Seoul Decadence-Live (2014) is a performance that reconstructed 9-Day Hamlet, a play performed by workers fired from Cort Guitar (Korea’s largest guitar manufacturer) after a factory closed in Seoul. These workers who have been involved in a variety of cultural activities including music, band, and theater over the course of 11 years while struggling for their reinstatement against unfair dismissal tried to bring their situation to the public eye by adapting Hamlet for a play in which they starred. Okin Collective casted co-directors of the play Vibrating Jelly (Eun-young Kwon and Mae-un-kong) when restaging this play as a performance. The play was turned into a sort of improvisational theater piece after the directors gave the nervous amateur performers advice which enabled them to candidly draw out their feelings.

Okin Collective’s performances are particularly marked by their amateur performers who have no formal professional training. Performers as well as audiences are physically present in the theater whose stage is not clearly separated from its auditorium. A new sense of solidarity is formed between the stage and the auditorium. This stage of reality Okin Collective has created aims to make it difficult to distinguish fiction from reality and is not made to perceive a staged situation as an actual one. That is to say, the stage of reality displays its effect with the ambiguity of a theatrical situation. The directors on stage who assume an unusual role present a situation in which the audience cannot judge if the person letting out a painful cry is speaking Ophelia’s lines or telling a worker’s personal story. In this way the audience takes part in their performance by being in a situation in which they do not know whether it is real or part of a play. The property of a fictional play is overlapped with that of an actual political rally in such a performance. Viewers are confused by these two different frames when they collide and are turned into performers in the theater. The apparatus of performance Okin Collective has conceived has subversive power in the boundaries between art and non-art through an exquisite combination of fictiveness and reality and a reversal of the relationship between the performer and the audience.

Recently at do it 2017, Seoul held at the Ilmin Museum of Art, Okin Collective executed a performance based on its reinterpretation of Pierre Huyghe’s instruction and turned the venue into an apparatus. Conceived from the instruction “Like the duration of a rainbow,” this performance seemed to highlight issues pertaining to homosexuality, gender, and minorities. Serving as an opportunity for participants to “view the exhibition with their companion animals (plants or something),” the performance aimed to disturb viewers with an experimentally forged situation as an apparatus, engendering a subtle condition between the participants and viewers. Unlike other projects akin to it, however, this performance did not bring about any particularly extreme confrontational situation. Rather, the viewers visited the museum dressed depending on a given dress code with their companion animals such as puppies, turtles, or parrots or even their favorite plants adorned in rainbow colors and enjoyed the refreshments and gifts offered by the artists. As each visitor is an antagonist of the performance, irrespective of whether they are homosexual or heterosexual, they exist as what they are instead of acting as “themselves” from the other’s point of view. Preexisting contentious social issues apropos of homosexuality including queers and the resultant gazes intrinsic to them are diluted or removed due to the setting up of such a situation and a forum for universality where everyone can assimilate with one another and bring forth their own meaning.

Instead of being a performance predicated upon a well-woven scenario, Okin Collective’s stage of reality reflects an aspect that is far more real than anything else. Their performance can be discussed in reference to social psychologists who have conducted experiments with behavioral patterns between viewers and participants. When given such a less extreme scenario, both participants and viewers tend to concentrate on “the relation” between personal and collective actions and ultimately discover themselves. What do you feel and how do you act when you see a pink medicine bottle for panic disorder medication which is someone’s companion object, the back view of a lesbian couple, and your little turtle on the back of someone else’s big dog? As the performance itself works as an apparatus to measure ethical, social, and gender differences, measuring behavioral patterns not only points out human behavioral patterns in ethical and social terms but also causes both viewers and participants to connect to the mechanism that serves to experiment with “the only emotional state” somewhere between pleasure and clumsiness. Measuring such an emotional state is all dependent on individual experience. Each individual who connects to this mechanism opens up possibilities to act from their own position and change arrangements and rearrangements.

4. Epilogue 

Okin Collective does not present a theatrical stage involving some climax through their apparatus-fiction. They also do not depend on a meticulous scenario to change a viewer’s perception. The stage of their practice is not the theater but life itself. Theatrical fictiveness does not vanish into reality but is, rather, reinforced by reality. After all, the stage Okin Collective has constructed and arranged makes invisible people and rules visible by completely blurring any boundaries. It thus enables viewers to see reality by changing their point of view.

As Franco Bifo Berardi argued, exhausted humans left behind in this era “after the future” when capitalism exists in the way “it mobilizes spiritual energy necessary for creative labor”12internalize a dominant mood of gloom and futility. The practices Okin Collective has carried out over the last ten years were to create a stage dominated by reality and to deploy, arrange, and reconstruct the apparatus to face reality through solidarity with those who have managed to survive in this age of collapse and disintegration. In a sense, they might be political, philosophical, and ecological experiments which the art of our time is able to conduct at the largest scale possible.

 


1. Donna J. Haraway, How Like a Leaf: A Conversation with Donna J. Haraway, Thyrz N. Goodeve, tran. Min Kyong-suk, Galmuri, 2005, p. 139.
2. Okin Collective, Okin Collective, Workroom Press, 2012, pp. 169-170.
3. Charlotte Rafaluk‐Mohr, Ben Ashby, Dylan A. Dahan, Kayla C. King, “Mutual fitness benefits arise during coevolution in a nematode-defensive microbe model.” Evolution Letters (2018), published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). pp. 246–256.
4. Interview, Okin Collective, Okin Collective.
5. Choi Yumi, The Thinker of Announcement, Donna J. Haraway, lecture note, Word Press, 2018, pp. 5-6.
6. Ibid.
7. Ibid.
8. Donna J. Haraway, Ibid., p. 114.
9. Interview, In Search of How to Revolve and Its Reverse (2018)
10. Jean-Luc Nancy, The Inoperative Community, trans. Park Jun-sang, Ingan Sarang, p. 161.
11. Michel Foucault, “The Confession of the Flesh”, Power / Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, Edited by Colin Gordon, Random House USA Inc., 1988, pp. 194-197.
12. Franco Bifo Berardi, After the Future, Edinburgh, AK Press, 2011, pp. 67-68.
Works